Ghost Photographs and Films

Posted in >

If ghosts are, in any objective sense, "real" then many assume it must be in man's gift to capture them on film or tape. Of course, sceptics will cough at the very notion - and even some 'believers' in the existence of ghosts take the view that in some fundamental sense they are internal to the viewer. But whatever the truth may be, people continue to capture what they believe to be images of the dead.

Many pictures once hailed as classics have crumbled in the light of modern analysis. In the relative youth of photography, long exposure times left many opportunities for deliberate or inadvertent interlopers to themselves as ghostly presences in a scene. Techniques such as double exposure were also a gift to charlatans or cultural tricksters. Today of course, the problem is magnified tenfold. Not only are cameras ubiquitous - carried by almost everyone in their pocket - but are now digital. This offers new opportunities for mistakes and hoaxers alike. Motes of dust near to the camera lens and caught in the strobing light of a flash are advanced as an explanation for the photographs of so-called 'orbs', which others take to be representations of the souls of the dead. For more concerted fakers, tools such as Photoshop have created many ways for the technologically literate to create beautifully realised fakes.

But yet: just because ghost photographs can and have been fakes does not necessarily mean that all ghost photographs are fakes. While the emotional appeal to the sceptically-minded is powerful, it is also a basic logical fallacy.

Comments and Discussion

Author: Ian Freud   |  Last updated: 6th October 2013 | © Weird Island 2010-2018
URL:
1.00 based on 2 reader ratings 5 stars
2 people found this to be 'bollocks'
Rate this entry: